Roman Emperor at the Time of Jesus

71

By IntimatEvolution

Source: Bad Church

A Bad Church Installment

When it comes to early church history, the Roman Emperor Tiberius usually takes second stage to other well known Roman emperors such as Nero, Caligula or Zeno. Truthfully, not much attention is paid too that of Emperor Tiberius, even though he ruled the Roman empire at the time of John the Baptist's beheading (as mention in the Gospel of Luke), and the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

In recent years, the reign of Tiberius has been re-evaluated to that of a more favorable opinion. It really wasn't until the later half of the twentieth century that historians finally decided to abandon the conclusion that Tiberius was a weak ruler. Nowadays, we know a different Tiberius. One who was much like that of his stepfather, the first emperor of Rome Augustus Julius Caesar, formally named Gaius Octavius Thurinus, the great-grandnephew of Julius Caesar.

History has revealed that there are many parallels between the two different reigns. We now know that they were both absolute rulers, taking little advice from the Senate. They both believed in the ideals of a strong family unit, and enacted laws that were thought to strengthen the bonds of family values. Even though it is written that later in Tiberius' reign, he gave into the seedy world of sexual deviancy and debauchery, these findings have never been proven or supported by any sort of historical or archaeological evidence. Because of this reason, I personally have a hard time believing much that is written about his later years, is true. It appears by all standards that Tiberius, has been the victim of a two thousand year smear campaign. The findings support a much different story. In truth he was a firm ruler, and to some groups of people, a cruel ruler.

I found an interesting bit of information from the Catholic Encyclopedia website, about the Emperor Tiberius, and I quote:

Shortly before his death, Tiberius recalled the procurator Pontius Pilate from Judea... Tiberius received a report concerning Christ ,and that he called upon the Senate to place Christ among the gods. The Senate rejected the request; Tiberius then threatened the accusers of the Christians with punishment.

The text goes on to say that the story is not worthy of belief, but, that the famed Roman historian Tertullian possibly knew of a document that may have supported this theory. Nobody of course knows for sure. So what does the supporting evidence tell us? Well..., from what I know I think the author of the article found on the Catholic website, must have fallen victim to "hearsay" history, which is historical facts that have no real tangible evidence supporting it.

I have recently discovered that in the eighteenth century, Spanish playwright, de Don Juan de Espinosa Malagon y Valenzuela writes a dramatic, comedy about the event surrounding Emperor Tiberius' personal meeting with Pontius Pilate after the crucifixion of Jesus. The play, "El Dichoso Desdichado, Poncio Pilato."

In the play, Tiberius is looking for a miracle because he's dying. He hears about the miracle work of Jesus Christ, and summons Pontius Pilate to find Jesus, and too personally escort him to Rome. That's when Tiberius soon discovers that Jesus Christ was already dead, and that Pontius Pilate was the one responsible for having Christ crucified. This of course outrages the ailing Emperor, so he sends for Pilate instead. The exact publish date of the play is unknown to me, however, I think it was sometime in the year 1739. The play was eventually introduced to a mass, English audience through a booklet published by Oxford University's press department in 1855 titled; "Notes and Queries".

According to a historical account, authored by an American, Latin, Scholar, Elmer Merrill (1860—1936); in the year 19 AD, Tiberius takes a drastic stance against the Jews, Egyptians and Astrologers living in Rome. It is at this point in time, when Tiberius commissions a directive that forces tens of thousands of Egyptian cult members, Astrologers, and Jewish settlers to leave the city of Rome, and disbands all Egyptian cult activity, Astrology readings, and Jewish activity in Rome. He even goes so far as to outlawed the Jewish faith within the city. Some 4,000 Jewish men were forced into the military, and eventually sent to the pestilential island of Sardinia, overrun by diseased. Those that choose not to serve or refuse to renounce their faith and remain in the city were gathered up and either sold into slavery, tortured, and killed. All other Jewish sects were forced out of the city. To my knowledge, the Hebrew historian Josephus, was the first to record the historical event in 97 AD, although there are several different accounts written by other known historians of this event.

It is also worth noting that this particular event has been linked to an embezzlement scheme, which involved the wife of nobleman who was a personal friend of Tiberius, and had nothing to do with the death of Jesus Christ. However, the embezzlement scheme helped to form Tiberius tyrannical hatred, of all things Jewish. I personally think that this hatred could have naturally evolved into a hatred of all things Christian, though there is no supporting evidence of that theory either. After this period, Tiberius is a honorable ruler of the Roman empire, though the history, like I mentioned early was distorted for a period of two thousand years, would have us to believe otherwise.



Rome: The Complete Series
Amazon Price: $57.75
List Price: $79.96
Rome: The Complete Series [Blu-ray]
Amazon Price: $69.90
List Price: $139.99
Rome: A Cultural, Visual, and Personal History
Amazon Price: $16.84
List Price: $35.00

Comments

Druid Dude profile image

Druid Dude Level 4 Commenter 9 months ago

Interesting. How roles change due to new perceptions. I feel that the story itself may be a fabrication, although, it is possible. Plausible deniability? Voting up on this one.

daskittlez69 profile image

daskittlez69 Level 3 Commenter 9 months ago

Thanks for the hub. I love Greco-Roman everything. Here is an up!

IntimatEvolution profile image

IntimatEvolution Hub Author 9 months ago

Thanks you two! I greatly appreciate your comments.

Robwrite profile image

Robwrite Level 7 Commenter 9 months ago

Very informative. This is a period of history I find fascinating. Thanks for the information.

Rob

IntimatEvolution profile image

IntimatEvolution Hub Author 9 months ago

Thanks Rob! I love that period as well.

Old Empresario profile image

Old Empresario Level 2 Commenter 9 months ago

Love it; great article you wrote. It is interesting and revealing and does not follow the old Suetonius canon of imperial history that most people regurgitate. I collect ancient coins and I have an old silver denarius with the image of Tiberius. It was minted in Jerusalem during the time of Jesus. I like to tell people that it might be the one Jesus pulled out of the fish's mouth and gave to the toll collector. The Jews were on the verge of revolt during the reign of Tiberius and some think that Jesus' movement was actually one of unity and civil disobedience (maybe even revolt) against Roman rule. The great revolt in Jerusalem did eventually come during the reign of Nero over 20 years later. But right before that, Paul of Tarsus had already created his famous sub-sect of Judaism (which included Gentiles) and had been executed in Rome. I believe it is all connected somehow.

VoltaireZ profile image

VoltaireZ 9 months ago

There's nothing I love about Rome, any more than I love any from of brutal imperialism.

My guess is that the Romans treated Judea much like we're treating the Afghanistan and Iraq, we're attempting to control the teaching of their religions. I suspect that is Jesus was a real person he was considered a dangerous radical and put to death by the Romans who then controlled what religious views could be taught and which couldn't and they allowed Christians that taught the Jews were responsible for killing Christ to live, and killed the ones that blamed the Romans.

I turn on the News and see a hundred falsehoods and lies presented everyday, but you dig those lies up a thousand years later and people take them as "historical facts." The Romans didn't become an empire without knowing how to manipulate the masses, how to write laws with one stated intent while actually trying to achieve another, and how to con people into believing in just about anything.

I do like Athens, which despite all its faults, gave humanity so much as is still the greatest democracy the world ever saw, as a civilization.

Don't mean to be bitter, but Rome was the opposite of everything Jesus stood for, but of course so is much of the behavior of the profits in the Old Testament.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working